Political Stability in New Democracies Presidentialism or...

Question For new democracies in the developing world, which system—presidentialism or parliamentarism— is more likely to ensure political stability? Why? And do we have a universal answer for all countries? Presidentialism and Parliamentarism are two of the most commonly practised political systems in modern politics, whether they be existing in pure forms or hybrid forms. Amongst the two, which system is more conducive to the maintenance of political stability, particularly in newly democratized states, has remained heatedly discussed. Presidentialism and Parliamentarism are differentiated by the election and removal methods of the political leader of the executive branch, the scope of authority of the executive leader, and the power†¦show more content†¦To ensure political stability and prevent riots, it is important to give representation to different parties, so that their cultural and political interests are articulated and catered to. Under parliamentarism, upon no simple majority vote on any party is casted, political parties are forced to form coalitions with other political parties, thus addressing the diverse interests of different groups in society. An example would be the first free election of Spain after democratization, where a total of 4 parties managed to win seats in the parliament, with none claiming a plurality vote (Linz, 1990). Proportional representation system, in complementary with parliamentarism, can â€Å"counteract potential threats to national unity and political stability in ethnically heterogeneous countries† (Rokkan, S., 1970, as cited in Lijphart, 1996). Bagehot (1981) observed that â€Å"the mutual dependence of cabinet and parliament for survival creates a strong incentive for legislators to form stable coalitions behind broad policy platforms†, hence more effectively aggregating and articulating the national diverse interests. Yet, the competitive nature of the presidential elections in presidentialism favours majoritarian and fosters two-party system, given that the presidency is nondivisive (Lijphart, 1996; Stepan amp; Skach, 1993), as wellShow MoreRelatedWhat are Presidentialism and Parliamentarism? 2332 Words   |  10 PagesWhat are presidentialism and parliamentarism? What are their virtues and vices? Which system is more suitable to new democracies, and why? Do we have a universal answer for all countries? Presidentialism and parliamentarism are two major forms of democratic government systems. Nearly all political systems in the world are modeled on them. (Mahler, 2000) The former is best respresented by the United States while the latter one is represented by the United Kingdom. The discussion in this essay isRead MoreThe Rule Of Law And Political Power1100 Words   |  5 PagesThe state is created to stave off anarchy and establish the rule of law. Critical to the organization of a new state is the constitutional democratic regime which it adopts to ensure the longevity and stability of the state. A key factor in determining state viability is the organization of the regime and allocation of political power, a concept known as institutional design. How political power is allocated among rival factions determines whether polarization and conflict results in compromiseRead MoreHow Democracy Can Be Divided Into Separate Different Types1986 Words   |  8 PagesDemocracy can be divid ed into separate different types. Presidentialism is a democratic type of government where president is either the head of state or a representative to the parliament. There are also hybrid regimes that combine different type of democracies to best fit that country’s needs. In other words, there are many types of democracies, although this essay will focus on three types of democratic systems: the presidential system, the semi-presidential system, and the parliamentary systemRead MoreThe United States uses a presidential system of government and is a stable democracy; therefore, it is advisable for new democracies to also choose pr1628 Words   |  7 PagesUnited States uses a presidential system of government and is a stable democracy; therefore, it is advisable for new democracies to also choose presidential systems of government. Discuss The United States is arguably the most powerful and prosperous nation in the world and has had a successful stable democracy under presidential government for over 200 years. So surely therefore new democracies in the modern day should adopt the presidential system of government usedRead MoreExplain the Difference Between Parliamentary and Presidential Forms of Government. What Is the Advantage of Each? Discuss1994 Words   |  8 Pagesgovernment system. There are two main types of parliamentarian in practice currently in the world. These are the British parliamentary government and the continental parliamentary government. I will be focusing on the practices of the British parliamentarism (Verney) A key factor of a parliamentary system is that it must have a Government that must consist of people elected from the Parliament. These Ministers must adhere to the direction and a degree of control by the parliament when doing theirRead MoreCan Presidential Systems Work Effectively Within Deeply Divided Societies? Essay2243 Words   |  9 PagesName: Amanda Raizis ID: 300306546 Tutor: Tim Webster Tutorial Time: Thursday 11.00-11.50pm Can presidential systems work effectively in deeply divided societies? [Make reference to at least two cases of your choosing.] Thesis Statement Presidentialism is a system of government in which the president is elected both chief executives and as head of government (Ogelsby Suà ¡rez, 1968) and is the main system of democratic government apart from parliamentary systems. Presidential systems tend toRead MoreThe Political Regime Of A Country995 Words   |  4 Pagesshaping the political regime of a country (Tsebelis, 1995; Helmke and Levitsky, 2004). However, there are several conditions should be examined in order to ensure the logical flow of the relationship. Institution is matter but it also depends on the other conditions (Przeworski, 2004). This paper review some articles in institutions, why there is a different opinion regarding the institutions and revisit Ramseyer and Rosenbluth’s book in order to gain more understanding about the political institutionRead MoreDemocracy Is A Key Component Of Today s Society2223 Words   |  9 Pagescountry. A government works fairly and with justice when there is rule by the people. Democracy is â€Å"a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections† (Webster Dictionary). The utmost powerful characteristic of democracy is that people hold the ultimate power. â€Å"Democracy is a government of the people, by the people, for the people† – Abraham Lincoln. A democraticRead MoreFgjf9195 Words   |  37 Pagescountry’s influence at the IMF is supposed to be pegged to the country’s economic dimension. But officials contention that voting is rare at the Fund. Well, the Fund operates by consensus. Many trust this â€Å"consensus† is controlled by the United States. New proof suggests that non-governmental actors, such as international financiers, also have an important voice in the shaping of IMF programs. To the degree that international actors use the IMF to further their own ends, the Fund may be settled on as